Sample audit

ExaminePeptides AI Visibility Audit

This sample shows how we identify the difference between a site that has strong deeper content and a site whose top-level pages are still difficult for answer engines to understand.

68/100

Executive finding

ExaminePeptides has a strong content foundation: large sitemaps, working robots and llms files, static peptide library pages, answer pages, MedicalWebPage schema, FAQ schema, citations, and reviewer fields on important compound pages.

The main weakness is that the homepage, about page, and editorial policy page return thin raw HTML with no detected static H1/H2 content or JSON-LD. This means the deepest pages may be understandable, while the site-level identity and trust model are less visible than they should be.

What was checked

Site architecture

Core, peptide, comparison, research, discovery, and answer sitemaps were checked.

Machine access

Robots and llms files were reviewed for AI/search crawler accessibility.

Structured pages

Library and answer pages were checked for headings, schema, citations, and trust signals.

Priority fixes

Priority Fix Why it matters Effort
P1 Render real static homepage content AI/search crawlers need more than title and meta description to understand the site entity. Medium
P1 Render about and editorial policy pages as unique static pages Health-adjacent answer visibility depends on trust, authorship, methodology, and disclaimers. Medium
P1 Add homepage JSON-LD Structured data gives machines a canonical model for the site and its database. Low
P2 Add homepage FAQ and internal links Answer engines need visible, extractable answers and routes to the best pages. Low

Competitor pattern

Peptide DB had stronger visible homepage packaging. Pep AI had clearer compliance framing. PeptideAtlas had stronger academic authority signals. ExaminePeptides already had better deeper-page structure than the homepage score suggested, which made the fix path clear.

Want this for your site?

Send a URL, business category, competitors, and priority pages. The audit returns a score, diagnosis, recommendations, and fix list.

Request audit